Just as she has glorified herself and lived luxuriously, so give to her torment and pain. Because in her heart she says, "I sit as a queen, I am not a widow, and I will never know pain." For this reason, in one day her plagues will come: death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned with fire, for strong is the Lord God who has judged her. Rev. 18:7, 8.
It is clear from our text that Babylon is not only wealthy--she is fully self-absorbed in her wealth. Her full attention is on her own pleasure, and she will defend that position at all costs. She has ignored the teaching of Jesus: "Give, and it will be given to you" (Luke 6:38, NIV). This suggests that if you want to be wealthy you have to give your riches away. To hoard them will cause you to lose them.
The fate of the Vanderbilt fortune illustrates the principle. The Vanderbilts differed with their wealthy peers in two respects. First, they had more money. William H. Vanderbilt, president of the New York Central Railroad, left his heirs $200 million upon his death in 1885. That sum had made him the wealthiest person on earth. Second, the family seemed beset with a great reluctance to share any of its wealth with those less fortunate. Shortly before his death the Commodore, as people referred to William H., responded to a Chicago Tribune reporter's question about social conscience with the expletive "The public be _____."
William Vanderbilt was not a total skinflint. He did give $1 million for the founding of Vanderbilt University and once allowed his wife to persuade him to donate $50,000 for the building of a church, as long as it was specified that the gift was a secular gesture, not a religious one.
The example of the Commodore seems to have been passed on to his descendants. What gifts they made to charity tended to be one-shot affairs, often after death. As was the case with the Commodore's church donation, they had no personal involvement in the few projects that they supported. Compared to the monumental contributions of the Morgans, the Fords, and the Rockefellers, the bequests of he Vanderbilt family were relatively small. Yet in spite of this careful hoarding of wealth, the Commodore's fortune is essentially gone today.
It seems that giving provides the sense of purpose that families need to keep the spirit and vigor of the founder alive for later generations. Where wealthy families have no such sense of purpose, they tend to dissipate their wealth in the pursuit of social and self-gratification, leading to the dissipation of the family fortune. To paraphrase Jesus again: "It is more blessed to give than to receive" (Acts 20:35, NIV).
Lord, touch my heart and the hearts of my children with the joy of giving.
It is clear from our text that Babylon is not only wealthy--she is fully self-absorbed in her wealth. Her full attention is on her own pleasure, and she will defend that position at all costs. She has ignored the teaching of Jesus: "Give, and it will be given to you" (Luke 6:38, NIV). This suggests that if you want to be wealthy you have to give your riches away. To hoard them will cause you to lose them.
The fate of the Vanderbilt fortune illustrates the principle. The Vanderbilts differed with their wealthy peers in two respects. First, they had more money. William H. Vanderbilt, president of the New York Central Railroad, left his heirs $200 million upon his death in 1885. That sum had made him the wealthiest person on earth. Second, the family seemed beset with a great reluctance to share any of its wealth with those less fortunate. Shortly before his death the Commodore, as people referred to William H., responded to a Chicago Tribune reporter's question about social conscience with the expletive "The public be _____."
William Vanderbilt was not a total skinflint. He did give $1 million for the founding of Vanderbilt University and once allowed his wife to persuade him to donate $50,000 for the building of a church, as long as it was specified that the gift was a secular gesture, not a religious one.
The example of the Commodore seems to have been passed on to his descendants. What gifts they made to charity tended to be one-shot affairs, often after death. As was the case with the Commodore's church donation, they had no personal involvement in the few projects that they supported. Compared to the monumental contributions of the Morgans, the Fords, and the Rockefellers, the bequests of he Vanderbilt family were relatively small. Yet in spite of this careful hoarding of wealth, the Commodore's fortune is essentially gone today.
It seems that giving provides the sense of purpose that families need to keep the spirit and vigor of the founder alive for later generations. Where wealthy families have no such sense of purpose, they tend to dissipate their wealth in the pursuit of social and self-gratification, leading to the dissipation of the family fortune. To paraphrase Jesus again: "It is more blessed to give than to receive" (Acts 20:35, NIV).
Lord, touch my heart and the hearts of my children with the joy of giving.
RSS Feed
